Welcome to IAFI’s “Question Corner”!
Answers may be found here

Do you have an Ice Age Floods-related question? We might have an answer!

Use the form at the bottom of the page to submit a short article, field trip description, or to share some geologic problem or site.
We’ll love to help you share it (anonmously) with others!

Question Corner Articles

Question Corner

Spokane Haystack Rocks

What are Spokane’s Haystack Basalt Mounds? Q – Throughout the Spokane area there are what some call ‘haystacks’, basalt mounds that look like haystacks. There are many such on Spokane’s south hill and I’m including a photo of one that’s in lower Lincoln Park. How did these form? Do they indicate the location of a volcanic vent? – John Ludders A1 – The picture is a large chunk of chill zone basalt. The sequence is chill zone, columnar basalt, entablature, capped by chill zone of the next flow. Like the columns, the chill zone is resistant to plucking but is weak and susceptible to hammering and chipping from rocks in the flow. Many are huge but are basically made in place by chipping, not being carried by flow. – Jim Shelden A2 – The basalt boulder appears to be a portion of the entablature portion of the basalt flow. This portion of the flow commonly worked on by the floodwaters is undercut and portions fall off and get rolled downstream. I have noted hundreds of these boulders in the Spokane area below basalt exposures (cliffs) especially along the north hills (north of Spokane River). They are analogous to the basalt boulders that are observed below Dry Falls (along Umatilla Rock-west side) as seen from the Dry Falls visitor center. The only difference is that the Spokane area gets more precipitation allowing ponderosa pines to grow around them. Also I am not aware that the Cordilleran Ice Sheet advanced south enough into the Spokane vicinity so the basalt boulders are not erratics or “haystack rocks” left after glacial melt. – Brent Cunderla

Read More »
News

Bone Pendants Suggest Humans in South America 25,000 Years Ago

The date that humans arrived in South America has been pushed back to at least 25,000 years ago, based on an unlikely source: bones from an extinct giant ground sloth that were crafted into pendants by ancient people. The presence of human-modified sloth bones in association with stone tools from geological layers that date to 25,000 to 27,000 years ago is strong evidence that people arrived in South America far earlier than previously assumed. Discovered in the Santa Elina rock shelter in central Brazil, three sloth osteoderms — bony deposits that form a kind of protective armor over the skin of animals such as armadillos — found near stone tools sported tiny holes that only humans could have made. The finding is among the earliest evidence for humans in the Americas, according to a paper published July 12 in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B. The Santa Elina rock shelter, located in the Mato Grosso state in central Brazil, has been studied by archaeologists since 1985. Previous research at the site noted the presence of more than 1,000 individual figures and signs drawn on the walls, hundreds of stone tool artifacts, and thousands of sloth osteoderms, with three of the osteoderms showing evidence of human-created drill holes. The newly published study documents these sloth osteoderms in exquisite detail to show that it is extremely unlikely that the holes in the bones were made naturally, with the implication that these bones push back the date humans settled in Brazil to 25,000 to 27,000 years ago. These dates are significant because of the growing — but still controversial — evidence for very early human occupation in South America, such as a date of 22,000 years ago for the Toca da Tira Peia rock shelter in eastern Brazil. Using a combination of microscopic and macroscopic visualization techniques, the team discovered that the osteoderms, and even their tiny holes, had been polished, and noted traces of stone tool incisions and scraping marks on the artifacts. Animal-made bite marks on all three osteoderms led them to exclude rodents as the creators of the holes. “These observations show that these three osteoderms were modified by humans into artefacts, probably personal ornaments,” the researchers wrote in their paper. Edited from Live Science article by Kristina Killgrove

Read More »
News

Kummakivi, Finland’s Balancing Rock, Seems to Defy the Laws of Physics

Our brains are pretty good at physics. For instance, you can watch somebody kick a soccer ball in front of you, and you can run to the spot where you and that soccer ball will intersect, taking into consideration the speed of both you and the ball — so smart! Not only that, we can look at one object balancing on another and tell how sturdy it is without so much as touching it. But sometimes our brains make uneducated mathematical guesses, and one of these is Kummakivi, the balancing rock in Ruokolahti, Finland. If it was up to your brain, Kummakivi — which means “strange rock” in Finnish — wouldn’t exist. It’s a boulder resting on a lump of rock in a position that, to our monkey engineer brains, appears impossible, or at least dicey. Extremely slap-dash and temporary work, at best. And yet Kummakivi sits quietly in its Scandinavian forest, racking up the centuries. Millennia, even. Kummakivi is huge — about 23 feet (7 meters) long. It rests on the tiny, steeply pitched footprint of a smaller mound of rock that rises from the forest floor. The balancing boulder appears to be about to slide right off its perch, but it can’t be moved — at least by human muscles. The reason for this isn’t as mysterious as it might appear: Kummakivi is large, but large things aren’t necessarily more likely to be affected by gravity than small ones. Kummakivi is very rough, which helps it stick in place, and it’s not the same density throughout. The center of gravity looks off when you inspect the balancing rock with your eyes, but it’s actually doing exactly what physics would have it do. But the real question is, how did it get there? People have probably always wondered that, but we’ll never know because it has been there approximately 12,000 years — way before we started recording anything. However, Finnish folklore says that some giants or trolls carried the rock to the forest and balanced it on its plinth. These days geologists say it was deposited by a retreating glacier at the end of the last ice age — and as we know, a glacier is basically the only thing as strong as a giant or a troll. By: Jesslyn Shields  |  Aug 24, 2022 reprinted from How Stuff Works

Read More »
Question Corner

Ice In Puget Valley

ice in puget valley Q – My daughter and family live west of Dean Kreger Rd, above Silver Lake, west of Eatonville. I tease her that her yard is gravel held together with a little sand. I believe they are close to the margin of an ice sheet but, I can’t find a map showing the margins. I’ve always been curious when I see different geology features and after watching all of Nick Zentner’s videos I’ve learned enough to be a hazard to myself and society. A – Google Search “Ice in Puget Valley”, “Vashon ice lobe”, “Glacial landforms of Puget Valley” and you will get more than you likely want! WA-DNR – Washington’s Glacial Geology WA-DNR – Glacial Landforms of the Puget Lowland Ice Thickness In Puget Sound

Read More »
News

Molten Mush Under Yellowstone Supervolcano

The mantle hotspot now under Yellowstone is thought to have been the source of the voluminous Columbia River Basalts that erupted from 17 to 6 million years ago as the North American continent passed over the hotspot, and that now underlie much of the path of the Ice Age Floods. During and since that time the hotspot cut a long and explosive path from the Oregon/Nevada/California border across the Snake River Plain, but ongoing research appears to show it to be fairly stable for at least our brief geologic time. A new study has found the amount of melted rock beneath Yellowstone’s supervolcano is far higher than previous estimates. Scientists have worked out the consistency of the magma under the Yellowstone caldera using seismic waves — and the reservoir is filled with “mush” that doesn’t pose an imminent eruption threat. While researchers say there is no sign of an imminent eruption, the discovery provides a more detailed view of what’s going on in the enormous magma chamber that sits beneath the national park. Far from a smooth blend of molten rock, magma reservoirs contain a large amount of solid rock, semi-liquid crystals, gasses and other volatile substances. This “magmatic mush” is highly dynamic but tends to burst out from deep underground when the proportion of liquid — or melt — crosses a certain threshold. Previous work suggests that eruptions typically occur when at least 50% of the space in the upper magma reservoir — a layer of flattened pockets of magma stacked on top of each other — is filled with melt. The magma reservoir beneath Yellowstone volcano consists of two chambers — a shallow reservoir near the surface that’s around 55 miles (90 kilometers) long and 25 miles (40 km) wide, and a deeper chamber that is about 4.5 times larger. While the deeper reservoir contains about 2% melt, the upper chamber contains far more: A study published in Science in December 2022 put the proportion of melt between 16% and 20%. Now, Sin-Mei Wu, a geophysicist and postdoctoral researcher with the Swiss Seismological Service at the Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) in Zurich, and colleagues have found the percentage is much higher. The team used seismic wave data to assess the texture and composition of the upper magma reservoir, which is about 3 miles (5 km) deep at Yellowstone. The results, published June 8 in the journal Earth and Planetary Science Letters, indicate the upper chamber consists of 28% melt — 8% to 12% more than the 2022 estimate, which was found with different methods, Wu said. “What we found is that the portion of liquid phase is not enough to have an imminent eruption,” Wu told Live Science. “Although we found a much higher portion of liquid than what was previously found, it’s still only up to 28%. So, to the best of our knowledge, Yellowstone will not have an imminent eruption.” Working out the proportion of liquid in magma reservoirs could help scientists evaluate the risk of volcanic eruptions elsewhere. “It’s important to understand the eruption potential, maybe not for Yellowstone so far, but you can apply the same methods to other magma systems that are more prone to eruption and to some that are already erupting,” Wu said. The methodology used for the study is “revolutionary in the detail and resolution it allowed for,” said Michael Poland, a research geophysicist and scientist-in-charge at the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory. The magma at Yellowstone and in other magmatic systems is like “mush,” Poland told Live Science in an email. “We often refer to ‘magmatic mush’ to convey a sense that it’s not a 100% molten ball, but also contains a lot of solid material — in the case of Yellowstone, way more solid than liquid material,” he added. “Maybe like a really thick lentil soup.” Despite recent breakthroughs, scientists can’t be sure what exactly lurks beneath the supervolcano, Wu said. “We are looking forward to some joint interpretation with other geophysical data to find out, for example, if we only have melt or if there is gas, volatiles, or something else that will help us understand the eruption dynamics.” From an article in Live Science by Sascha Pare

Read More »
News

Were Humans Present in the Area During the Ice Age Floods?

During the last ice age, humans ventured into two vast and completely unknown continents: North and South America. For nearly a century, researchers thought they knew how this wild journey occurred: The first people to cross the Bering Land Bridge, a massive swath of land that connected Asia with North America when sea levels were lower, were the Clovis, who made the journey shortly before 13,000 years ago. According to the Clovis First theory, every Indigenous person in the Americas could be traced to this single, inland migration, said Loren Davis, a professor of anthropology at Oregon State University. But in recent decades, several discoveries have revealed that humans first reached the so-called New World thousands of years before we initially thought and probably didn’t get there by an inland route. So who were the first Americans, and how and when did they arrive? Genetic studies suggest that the first people to arrive in the Americas descend from an ancestral group of Ancient North Siberians and East Asians that mingled around 20,000 to 23,000 years ago and crossed the Bering Land Bridge sometime between then and 15,500 years ago. Geneticists studying the first Americans tend to paint a more consistent picture than archaeologists do, mainly because they’re using the same human remains and genetic datasets. Genetic analyses have found that Ancient North Siberians and a group of East Asians paired up around 20,000 to 23,000 years ago. Soon after, the population split into two genetically distinct groups: one that stayed in Siberia, and another, the basal American branch, which emerged around 20,000 to 21,000 years ago. Genetic data suggest the descendants of this basal American branch crossed the Bering Land Bridge and became the first Americans. But some archaeological sites hint that people may have reached the Americas far earlier than that. There are fossilized human footprints in White Sands National Park in New Mexico that may date to 21,000 to 23,000 years ago. That would mean humans arrived in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), which occurred between about 26,500 to 19,000 years ago, when ice sheets covered much of what is now Alaska, Canada and the northern U.S. Other, more equivocal data suggest the first people arrived in the Western Hemisphere by 25,000 or even 31,500, years ago. If these dates can be confirmed, they would paint a much more complex picture of how and when humans reached the Americas. Almost all scientists agree, however, that this incredible journey was made possible by the emergence of Beringia — a now-submerged, 1,100-mile-wide (1,800 kilometers) landmass that connected what is now Alaska and the Russian Far East. During the last ice age, much of Earth’s water was frozen in ice sheets, causing ocean levels to fall. Beringia surfaced once waters in the North Pacific dropped roughly 164 feet (50 meters) below today’s levels; it was passable by foot between 30,000 and 12,000 years ago. From there, the archaeological picture gets muddier. The older version of the story originated in the 1920s and 1930s, when Western archaeologists discovered sharp-edged, leaf-shaped stone spear points near Clovis, New Mexico. The people who made them, now dubbed the Clovis people, lived in North America between 13,000 and 12,700 years ago, based on a 2020 analysis of bone, charcoal and plant remains found at Clovis sites. At the time, it was thought that the Clovis traveled across Beringia and then moved through an ice-free corridor, or “a gap between the continental ice sheets,” in what is now part of Alaska and Canada. However, new discoveries have turned back the clock on the first Americans’ arrival. In 1976, researchers learned about the site of Monte Verde II in southern Chile, which radiocarbon dating showed was about 14,550 years old. It took decades for archaeologists to accept the dating of Monte Verde, but soon, other sites also pushed back the date of humans’ arrival in the Americas. The Paisley Caves in Oregon contain human coprolites, or fossilized poop, dating to about 14,500 years ago. Page-Ladson, a pre-Clovis site in Florida with stone tools and mastodon bones, dates to about 14,550 years ago. And Cooper’s Ferry — a site that includes stone tools, animal bones and charcoal — dates to around 16,000 years ago. Then, in 2021, scientists announced much more ancient traces of human occupation: fossilized footprints in White Sands, New Mexico dating to between 21,000 and 23,000 years ago. Sites such as White Sands and Cooper’s Ferry have big implications for how the first people arrived in the Americas. It’s thought that the ice-free corridor through North America didn’t fully open until about 13,800 years ago. So if humans were in the Americas long before then, they likely traveled there along the Pacific coast. That coastal journey could have been made by foot, by watercraft, or both. But no fossil or archaeological evidence of this journey has been unearthed. Ideally, archaeologists would like to find more sites from all of these branches, especially any remains that could explain the genetics behind the people at White Sands between 23,000 and 21,000 years ago. Evidence of these long-lost people can be found in the remains of the animals they butchered, the charcoal they burned, the tools they crafted and the loved ones they buried. Local Indigenous Peoples’ stories strongly suggest humans were in the area during the Ice Age Floods, but tangible scientific evidence is sparse and yet to be found in the area. Eedited from a Live Science article by Laura Geggel

Read More »
Question Corner

Quaternary

Quaternary—What is that??? Ice Age Floods Institute Members may have heard the term Quaternary during Chapter Presentations and Field Trips, or may have learned that the Quaternary Period represents the last 2.588 million years (~2.6 million years) of earth history, or that it is divided into the Pleistocene and Holocene Epochs. The Quaternary began with the Pleistocene (~2.6 million years ago) and the strata and landscape features reflect the major climate changes of the last Ice Age (synonymous with the Pleistocene Epoch). But where did the term Quaternary come from?  The word suggests the number four as in quadrangle, quadrant, quadruplet, etc. For its origins we need to go back a few hundred years to see how the geologic time scale in use today had its origins. The science of geology had a very slow start only beginning to take hold in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. Both Giovanni Arduino (1714-1795) a mining geologist studying the rock layers in northern Italy around 1759 and Jules Desnoyers working in the Seine Basin in France in 1829 divided their rock sequences into four units; Primary, Secondary, Tertiary and Quaternary. The term Quaternary was applied by Desnoyers to the fourth more recent strata that consists of loose to poorly indurated or cemented strata. The terms Primary and Secondary have been dropped but Tertiary and Quaternary are still used today. These attempts to develop a regional framework of strata were based on the publication of a paper by NIcholaus Steno in 1669 where he laid out the geologic Principle of Superposition. He argued that lower strata in a tectonically undisturbed section must be older than those on top. He also pointed out that strata tend to be deposited in a horizontal position, the law of Original Horizontality. How old these strata might be was not known, new tools would need to be developed to answer that question. However, that is another story. Gene Kiver June 2020

Read More »
News

Dinosaur-Killing Asteroid May Have Had a Companion

A newly discovered crater suggests a second impact that would have triggered underwater landslides and tsunamis On its own, the dinosaur-killing asteroid had a staggering impact: Wildfires raged across the continents, tsunamis pummeled coastlines and about three-quarters of Earth’s species went extinct. But now, new evidence suggests this massive chunk of rock may have had a partner: Scientists discovered what might be an impact crater off the coast of Guinea that they say dates to 66 million years ago—around the same time as the collision that wiped out the dinosaurs. This second asteroid may have broken off from the dinosaur-killer, known as Chicxulub, or it may have been part of a closely timed impact cluster, according to a new study published in Science Advances. “A lot of people have questioned: How could the Chicxulub impact—albeit a huge one—be so globally destructive?” Veronica Bray, a planetary scientist from the University of Arizona and paper co-author, tells National Geographic’s Maya Wei-Haas. “It might be that it had help.” Researchers discovered what they dubbed the Nadir crater—named after a nearby underwater volcano—in 2020, while examining seismic survey data. “We came across a highly unusual feature,” write Bray and co-authors Uisdean Nicholson and Sean Gulick for The Conversation. “Among the flat, layered sediments of the Guinea Plateau, west of Africa, was what appeared to be a large crater, a little under 10 km wide and several hundred meters deep, buried below several hundred meters of sediment.” Nicholson, a geoscientist from Heriot-Watt University in the United Kingdom, has been interpreting such surveys for about 20 years. But he has “never seen anything like this,” he tells BBC News’ Jonathan Amos. Though scientists haven’t confirmed it was caused by an asteroid, features of Nadir, including its scale, the ratio of height to width and the height of the crater rim, are consistent with an impact origin, write the authors in The Conversation. Additionally, deposits around Nadir look like materials ejected from a crater after a collision. Computer modeling showed that to cause this impact, an asteroid would likely have been about 0.25 miles across and hit an ocean that was more than 2,600 feet deep, per The Conversation. In comparison, the Chicxulub asteroid was likely around six miles wide. Still, this second impact would have been sizable. “The energy released would have been around 1,000 times greater than that from the January 2022 eruption and tsunami in Tonga,” Bray tells BBC News. The hit would have caused shock waves equivalent to a magnitude 6.5 or 7 earthquake, which would have triggered underwater landslides and a series of tsunamis, write the authors. “The discovery of a terrestrial impact crater is always significant, because they are very rare in the geologic record,” Mark Boslough, an earth and planetary scientist at the University of New Mexico, who was not involved in the research, tells CNN’s Katie Hunt. “There are fewer than 200 confirmed impact structures on Earth and quite a few likely candidates that haven’t yet been unequivocally confirmed.” To verify that Nadir was truly formed by an asteroid strike, as well as find a precise date for the collision and determine its connection to Chicxulub, scientists will need to drill into the formation and collect samples. The team has already applied for emergency funds for this additional research, per National Geographic. The drilling could also give scientists clues about how life on Earth responded to the impact. “Part of the Nadir drilling goal is to analyze the sediment that was deposited onto Nadir over time,” Bray tells Inverse’s Kiona Smith. “When did life recover? How?” Smithsonian Magazine article by Margaret Osborne

Read More »
Question Corner

What Made This?

Any idea what made this formation? Q – This is in the Utah desert, south of Green River. I keep hearing that it might be clastic dikes? I have sent this pic to the USGS and they are kinda stumped too but plan to send some paleontologists to check it out. A – The clastic dike explanation looks quite probable. As I understand it, when a fluid (typically water) saturated body of sediment is overlain by another thick layer of sediment the weight of the overlying sediment over-pressures the fluid in the saturated sediment body, resulting in the fluid forcing its way toward the surface, where the pressure is lower, and entraining the accompanying sediment as it rises. Probably looks like a lava lamp, though the processes are distinctly different Comments Any idea what made this formation? — 3 Comments Lloyd DeKay on Dec. 2, 2023 at 2:40 pm said:I suggest the flat tops of these clastic dikes are the result of an impenetrable layer atop the dike-bearing strata, which has subsequently been eroded away.Lloyd DeKay – Webmaster for IAFI Bradai Mohammed on December 2, 2023 at 2:14 pm said: These are called clastic dikes, commonly vertical, they fill open fractures with the help of water, cutting another bed (mud) that’s sitting above, after that it goes through differential erosion, where the soft sediment (mud) gets eroded, and the harder one (sandstone) survive to give you this formation. BRADAI Mohammed El AmineGraphic Designer & Mag. Editor, CEO & Founder of GeoTeach.MePhD student in Stratigraphy-Paleontology, University of Mohamed Ben Ahmed Oran 2, Algeria. Blog: www.geoteachme.blogspot.comInstagram: @the.gneiss.moFacebook: Mohammed BrdYouTube: Explore with Mo Phone: (+213) 798 23 96 50Professional email: Bradai@bk.ru Norman Smyers on July 31, 2020 at 12:18 pm said: My Masters Thesis was clastic dikes of the Panoche Hills (central) California. And yes, the features seen in these photographs from Utah and seen in the recent issue of the Newsletter do look somewhat that they could be associated with clastic dikes. However, I would want to view them up close and personal before saying anything more. For one, the fracture system of the area is a strong clue as to their origins, something difficult to determine with the information at hand. I don’t remember any of my dike structures being evenly truncated at their tops. Obviously at some point in their history there was significant erosion that planed the top of the structure off as well as the surrounding area; and the structures were durable enough to resist subsequent erosion and weathering enough so to persist, as we see them, to present. To make them as durable as they appear to be I would speculate that they were injected from below and into their existing cracks by sediment overlying a fluid rock unit (unconsolidated and wet sediment). Norman Smyers3

Read More »
Geologic Feature

A New Class of Plate Tectonics – Lithospheric Dripping

Crinkles and divots in the surface of Earth on Türkiye’s Central Anatolian Plateau are the smoking gun for a newly discovered class of plate tectonics. Beneath a depression called the Konya Basin, Earth’s crust is slowly dripping deeper into the planetary interior, a process that is gradually shaping the surface geology of not just the basin, but the plateau that surrounds it. It’s called lithospheric dripping, a phenomenon that has only recently been discovered here on Earth, and geologists are still figuring out the different ways it manifests. When the lower portion of Earth’s rocky crust is heated to a certain temperature, it starts to go a little gooey. Then, like honey or syrup, it slowly oozes downward – a bit like a pitch drop experiment, but much bigger and slower. As this drop descends, it pulls the planetary crust down with it. This creates a depression, or basin. Then, when the drop detaches into the mantle, the surface rebounds, bulging upwards, with a widespread effect. The Central Anatolian Plateau is known to be uplifting over time. Previous research suggests that it has gained around a kilometer (0.6 miles) in altitude over the past 10 million years thanks to the release of a crusty drip. But then there’s the Konya Basin, which is subsiding downwards at a rate of around 20 millimeters (0.8 inches) per year. That doesn’t sound like much, but a sinking patch of ground in a region that is rising upwards warrants further investigation. The broader region of the plateau is in the throes of the rebound phase of the lithospheric drip process, after having dropped its gooey molten load into the mantle. The Konya Basin? That’s a smaller, second drip forming. “As the lithosphere thickened and dripped below the region, it formed a basin at the surface that later sprang up when the weight below broke off and sank into the deeper depths of the mantle,” says Earth scientist Russell Pysklywec of the University of Toronto. “We now see the process is not a one-time tectonic event and that the initial drip seems to have spawned subsequent daughter events elsewhere in the region, resulting in the curious rapid subsidence of the Konya Basin within the continuously rising plateau of Türkiye.” Excerpt from a Science Alert article By Michelle Starr

Read More »
Key Archives

Bering Land Bridge Formed Surprisingly Late During Last Ice Age

By reconstructing the sea level history of the Bering Strait, scientists found that the strait remained flooded and the Bering Land Bridge connecting Asia to North America did not emerge until around 35,700 years ago, less than 10,000 years before the height of the last ice age (known as the Last Glacial Maximum), and not long before humans are thought to have begun migrating into the Americas. The new findings indicate that the growth of the ice sheets—and the resulting drop in sea level—occurred surprisingly quickly and much later in the glacial cycle than previous studies had suggested. “It means that more than 50 percent of the global ice volume at the Last Glacial Maximum grew after 46,000 years ago,” said Tamara Pico, assistant professor of Earth and planetary sciences at UC Santa Cruz and a corresponding author of the paper. “This is important for understanding the feedbacks between climate and ice sheets, because it implies that there was a substantial delay in the development of ice sheets after global temperatures dropped.” Global sea levels drop during ice ages as more and more of Earth’s water gets locked up in massive ice sheets, but the timing of these processes has been hard to pin down. During the Last Glacial Maximum, which lasted from about 26,500 to 19,000 years ago, ice sheets covered large areas of North America. Dramatically lower sea levels uncovered a vast land area known as Beringia that extended from Siberia to Alaska and supported herds of horses, mammoths, and other Pleistocene fauna. As the ice sheets melted, the Bering Strait became flooded again around 13,000 to 11,000 years ago. The new findings are interesting in relation to human migration because they shorten the time between the opening of the land bridge and the arrival of humans in the Americas. The timing of human migration into North America remains unresolved, but some studies suggest people may have lived in Beringia throughout the height of the ice age. “People may have started going across as soon as the land bridge formed,” Pico said. The new study used an analysis of nitrogen isotopes in seafloor sediments to determine when the Bering Strait was flooded during the past 46,000 years, allowing Pacific Ocean water to flow into the Arctic Ocean. First author Jesse Farmer at Princeton University led the isotope analysis, measuring nitrogen isotope ratios in the remains of marine plankton preserved in sediment cores collected from the seafloor at three locations in the western Arctic Ocean. Because of differences in the nitrogen composition of Pacific and Arctic waters, Farmer was able to identify a nitrogen isotope signature indicating when Pacific water flowed into the Arctic. Pico, whose expertise is in sea level modeling, then compared Farmer’s results with sea level models based on different scenarios for the growth of the ice sheets. “The exciting thing to me is that this provides a completely independent constraint on global sea level during this time period,” Pico said. “Some of the ice sheet histories that have been proposed differ by quite a lot, and we were able to look at what the predicted sea level would be at the Bering Strait and see which ones are consistent with the nitrogen data.” The results support recent studies indicating that global sea levels were much higher prior to the Last Glacial Maximum than previous estimates had suggested, she said. Average global sea level during the Last Glacial Maximum was about 130 meters (425 feet) lower than today. The actual sea level at a particular site such as the Bering Strait, however, depends on factors such as the deformation of the Earth’s crust by the weight of the ice sheets. “It’s like punching down on bread dough—the crust sinks under the ice and rises up around the edges,” Pico said. “Also, the ice sheets are so massive they have gravitational effects on the water. I model those processes to see how sea level would vary around the world and, in this case, to look at the Bering Strait.” The findings imply a complicated relationship between climate and global ice volume and suggest new avenues for investigating the mechanisms underlying glacial cycles. In addition to Pico and Farmer, the coauthors include Ona Underwood and Daniel Sigman at Princeton University; Rebecca Cleveland-Stout at the University of Washington; Julie Granger at the University of Connecticut; Thomas Cronin at the U.S. Geological Survey; and François Fripiat, Alfredo Martinez-Garcia, and Gerald Haug at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Germany. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation. Published  in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Reprinted from UC Santa Cruz Newsletter, By Tim Stephens

Read More »
Question Corner

Rounded Boulders Spokane

Rounded Boulders in Spokane Ice Rafted Erratics? Q – I have noticed places around Spokane where there are large accumulations of similarly-size boulders. They are smooth and generally about a meter in diameter.. The type of stone varies, but none are Columbia Basin basalt. I assume these are ice-rafted erratics. My question is how did so many end up in a few locations and why are they all similarly sized? My guess is that the flood waters ran into a slope and became still enough to drop similarly-sized loads. Is that right? Or is there another explanation? The South Hill Park and Ride has 81 scattered around the site, some of which I assume were pushed out of the way for paving. Another site nearby has perhaps 40 used for a retaining wall. The Spokane Valley YMCA has a lot, as does the parking lot for the Dishman Hills Natural Area. There are also places along Trent Avenue where these stones are found. Thanks for your reply. – James VanderMeer A – Most all of the well-rounded boulders that clutter parts of the floor of the Spokane Valley are, indeed, derived from the Ice Age floods, but are probably were not ice-rafted to their present locations. They were moved by the tremendous power just downstream from the initial Ice Dam failure, rolled or bounced along the bottom of Glacial Lake Columbia and accumulated rapidly in the deeper parts of the lake. The power of the flood currents dissipated as the waters moved west. Most of the large boulders found father west were probably ice-rafted. The source for these boulders was most likely glacial moraine and stream sediments from Idaho, Montana, and Canada, thus no local basalt in the mix. Because they were “current” derived, they are often sorted in size, and derive from a source where there has been much erosion already and well rounded. More information on this can be had in the online Zoom lecture “What Happened When the Dam Burst” by the IAFI on November 24 by Michael Hamilton.

Read More »
News

How Galactic Rhythms Helped Form Earth’s Continental Crust

“To see a world in a grain of sand”, the opening sentence of the poem by William Blake, is an oft-used phrase that also captures some of what geologists do. We observe the composition of mineral grains, smaller than the width of a human hair. Then, we extrapolate the chemical processes they suggest to ponder the construction of our planet itself. Now, we’ve taken that minute attention to new heights, connecting tiny grains to Earth’s place in the galactic environment. Looking out to the universe At an even larger scale, astrophysicists seek to understand the universe and our place in it. They use laws of physics to develop models that describe the orbits of astronomical objects. Although we may think of the planet’s surface as something shaped by processes entirely within Earth itself, our planet has undoubtedly felt the effects of its cosmic environment. This includes periodic changes in Earth’s orbit, variations in the Sun’s output, gamma ray bursts, and of course meteorite impacts. Just looking at the Moon and its pockmarked surface should remind us of that, given Earth is more than 80 times more massive than its gray satellite. In fact, recent work has pointed to the importance of meteorite impacts in the production of continental crust on Earth, helping to form buoyant “seeds” that floated on the outermost layer of our planet in its youth. We and our international team of colleagues have now identified a rhythm in the production of this early continental crust, and the tempo points to a truly grand driving mechanism. This work has just been published in the journal Geology. The rhythm of crust production on Earth Many rocks on Earth form from molten or semi-molten magma. This magma is derived either directly from the mantle – the predominantly solid but slowly flowing layer below the planet’s crust – or from recooking even older bits of pre-existing crust. As liquid magma cools, it eventually freezes into solid rock. Through this cooling process of magma crystallization, mineral grains grow and can trap elements such as uranium that decay over time and produce a sort of stopwatch, recording their age. Not only that, but crystals can also trap other elements that track the composition of their parental magma, like how a surname might track a person’s family. With these two pieces of information – age and composition – we can then reconstruct a timeline of crust production. Then, we can decode its main frequencies, using the mathematical wizardry of the Fourier transform. This tool basically decodes the frequency of events, much like unscrambling ingredients that have gone into the blender for a cake. Our results from this approach suggest an approximate 200-million-year rhythm to crust production on the early Earth. Our place in the cosmos But there is another process with a similar rhythm. Our Solar System and the four spiral arms of the Milky Way are both spinning around the supermassive black hole at the galaxy’s center, yet they are moving at different speeds. The spiral arms orbit at 210 kilometers per second, while the Sun is speeding along at 240km per second, meaning our Solar System is surfing into and out of the galaxy’s arms. You can think of the spiral arms as dense regions that slow the passage of stars much like a traffic jam, which only clears further down the road (or through the arm). This model results in approximately 200 million years between each entry our Solar System makes into a spiral arm of the galaxy. So, there seems to be a possible connection between the timing of crust production on Earth and the length of time it takes to orbit the galactic spiral arms – but why? Strikes from the cloud In the distant reaches of our Solar System, a cloud of icy rocky debris named the Oort cloud is thought to orbit our Sun. As the Solar System periodically moves into a spiral arm, interaction between it and the Oort cloud is proposed to dislodge material from the cloud, sending it closer to the inner Solar System. Some of this material may even strike Earth. Earth experiences relatively frequent impacts from the rocky bodies of the asteroid belt, which on average arrive at speeds of 15km per second. But comets ejected from the Oort cloud arrive much faster, on average 52km per second. We argue it is these periodic high-energy impacts that are tracked by the record of crust production preserved in tiny mineral grains. Comet impacts excavate huge volumes of Earth’s surface, leading to decompression melting of the mantle, not too dissimilar from popping a cork on a bottle of fizz. This molten rock, enriched in light elements such as silicon, aluminum, sodium, and potassium, effectively floats on the denser mantle. While there are many other ways to generate continental crust, it’s likely that impacting on our early planet formed buoyant seeds of crust. Magma produced from later geological processes would adhere to those early seeds. Harbingers of doom, or gardeners for terrestrial life? Continental crust is vital in most of Earth’s natural cycles – it interacts with water and oxygen, forming new weathered products, hosting most metals and biological carbon. Large meteorite impacts are cataclysmic events that can obliterate life. Yet, impacts may very well have been key to the development of the continental crust we live on. With the recent passage of interstellar asteroids through the Solar System, some have even gone so far as to suggest they ferried life across the cosmos. However we came to be here, it is awe-inspiring on a clear night to look up at the sky and see the stars and the structure they trace, and then look down at your feet and feel the mineral grains, rock, and continental crust below – all linked through a very grand rhythm indeed. By Chris Kirkland and Phil Sutton, THE CONVERSATION – from Science Alert

Read More »
News

The Oldest Stone Tools Ever Found in the US

Indigenous people have been in the Americas longer than archaeologists once thought. Stone tools unearthed from a rock shelter in Southern Oregon were last used more than 18,000 years ago, radiocarbon dating suggests. That makes the site one of the oldest-known human living spaces in the Americas. Buried deep beneath a layer of volcanic ash, archaeologists excavating Rimrock Draw Rockshelter found two stone scraping tools, which ancient knappers had skillfully shaped from pieces of orange agate. A residue of dried bison blood still clung to the edges of one scraper, a remnant of the last bit of work some ancient person had done with the tool before discarding it. The layer of volcanic ash above the tools had blasted out of Mount St. Helens, a few hundred kilometers north of the rock shelter, 15,000 years ago, long after the fine agate scrapers, and the people who made and used them, had been forgotten. In a layer of dirt below the volcanic ash but above the stone tools, archaeologists found broken teeth from now-extinct relatives of modern camels and bison. Radiocarbon dating on a piece of bison tooth enamel (first in 2012, and confirmed recently by more testing) suggests the teeth belonged to animals that lived about 18,250 years ago. And because those teeth were buried in a layer of dirt above the stone tools, they must have ended up in Rimrock Draw sometime after the tools. That makes the agate scraper, complete with bloody evidence of its use, more than 18,000 years old—and one of the oldest traces of human presence in North America. But the people who lived in Oregon more than 18,000 years ago almost certainly weren’t the first to call the continent home. In Idaho, the Nimiipuu (Nez Perce) know the Cooper’s Ferry archaeological site as the ancient location of a village they call Nipehe. The oldest artifacts unearthed at the site date to at least 16,000 years ago, and it looks like people lived there, at least off and on, for several thousand years after those first arrivals. To have reached Cooper’s Ferry 16,000 years ago, the ancient inhabitants of Nipehe would have had to cross Beringia, a land mass that connected what’s now Russia with what’s now Canada during the last Ice Age, when sea levels were lower. They then had to move south along the Pacific Coast of North America, skirting along the western edge of the great ice sheet, until they reached the southern edge of the ice. The ice-free corridor wouldn’t open until about 15,000 to 14,000 years ago. By then, people were already living far, far south of the ice: Archaeologists found stone tools and butchered mastodon bones submerged in a Florida sinkhole that dated back to 14,500 years ago. And in Chile, someone left behind a single footprint 14,600 years ago. Thanks to footprints on an island off the coast of what’s now British Columbia, we know that at least some people did make their way along the coasts about 13,000 years ago. But some archaeologists, like Bournemouth University’s Matthew Bennett and his colleagues, say that those coastal migrants may have found their way into a continent already home to people who arrived at least 26,000 years ago—long before the ice sheets blocked the way into North America from Asia. In the mountains of north-central Mexico, archaeologists unearthed stone tools from Chiquihuite Cave, which dated back to around 30,000 years ago. And at White Sands National Monument in New Mexico, it appears that someone walked along the ancient shoreline of Lake Otero (now long since dry) between 23,000 and 21,000 years ago, leaving behind a trail of 61 footprints. Archaeologists dated the White Sands footprints thanks to grass seeds trapped in the layers of clay and silt above and below the tracks, which helped bracket their possible age. Some archaeologists are still skeptical, partly because there are so few sites this old south of the ice sheets, but there’s enough evidence to take the claims seriously. Taken from an article by KIONA N. SMITH published in arsTechnica

Read More »

Question Corner

Ask a question of our technical committee or submit a short article for our website

  • Drop files here or
    Accepted file types: jpg, png, pdf, docx, Max. file size: 256 MB.
      You can upload multiple files, including jpg, png, pdf and docx up to a total of 256 Mb.
    • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.